Archive for May, 2008

The motivational meeting…

Last week, I ranted a little bit about motivational meetings. Today I’ll make the opposite case.

Why have motivational meetings?

The right way to use motivational meetings is to reaffirm the purposes of the group, and help people to connect the dots between their individual efforts and the collective goals of the group, and to connect those goals with their own individual aspirations.

Basically, motivating people is easy:

  • Give them work that is meaningful to them and to the organization
  • Treat them with respect

Treating people with respect includes paying them a fair wage, and not doing any of these things.

Among other things it also means not letting people who aren’t contributing to the common goals of the organization hold back the group by not doing their job.

Research has shown that one of the survey questions most highly correlated with motivation and performance is:

Does my supervisor, or someone at work, seem to care about me as a person?

Which is another way of saying does your boss respect you. At the same time the single highest correlation for any question was:

I get to do what I do best everyday at work.

So, it’s really important to line people’s intrisic skills and internal long-term motivational drivers with the work you ask them to do.

If you’re not doing those two things, motivational meetings are a loss. If you are doing them you can use a meeting to remind people of how their deeper motivations are connected to what they are doing now.

P.S. My info on the top questions and their correlation to performance comes from Gallop research via the very interesting book First Break All the Rules, which is one of the best, and most evidence based, books on managing for exceptional performance I’ve read.

Motivate me when I’m dead…

It think the very idea that motivation can be “imparted” in a morning meeting, or a half day seminar is kind of demeaning.

Motivation is a complex network of hopes, dreams, fears, needs, frustrations, incentives, and personal morality. Motivating people is as much about connecting their individual aspirations to the goals of the organization as anything. If people can do what’s right, become who they want to be, and get paid to do it, that’s a far more powerful motivator than you can get from any meeting.

If those things are true, you can skip the motivational meeting. Everybody would rather sit down and get some work done. And if they aren’t true it’s not likely that another meeting will help.

For some (very small) values of done…

What does done mean? Somebody was telling me that Ruby 1.9 was “pretty much done” last night.

What is Ruby 1.9? Do we have a spec? A test suite? Anything? If the answer is no, it’s not ready.

–Charels Nutter (in a comment here)

Partly that’s because Charels wants 1.9 as a reference implementation — not just usable interpreter.

But, that highlights one of the reasons I like the way python is developed. There is a test suite, there is a reasnably complete set of specifications. So, from here, it looks like Python 3 is a lot “more done” than Ruby 1.9. But that’s OK, they are both way more done that Perl 6. ;)

I’m still looking forward to Ruby 1.9, and python 3.0.